xplorYi-1
Sign inSign up

USCG-STCW-MGT-L2.2

The Second Engineer pairing table — Table 1 to 11.327(d)

If Table 1 to 11.325(d) is the wall, Table 1 to 11.327(d) is the door. This is where the national assistant grades convert into a management-level STCW endorsement — and it is the table that proves, in one line, that the **STCW Second Engineer Officer is the US First Assistant Engineer**.

Entry & progression

Table 1 to 46 CFR 11.327(d). The assistant grades' door. First Assistant: none. Second Assistant: none. Third Assistant: 12 months. And a genuine internal conflict in the CFR that we are going to flag rather than pretend away.

The table

National endorsement held Additional sea service for STCW III/2 Second Engineer Officer
First Assistant Engineer None
Second Assistant Engineer None
Third Assistant Engineer 12 months
Assistant Engineer-Limited 12 months
Chief Engineer-MODU 12 months
Chief Engineer-OSV None
DDE-Unlimited 12 months as DDE — STCW certificate "should be limited to vessels less than 500 GRT"

Read it as a map, not a menu

The First Assistant enters with nothing owed — because the two ranks are the same rank. The Third Assistant and the Assistant Engineer-Limited, both a real distance below, each owe 12 months. The Coast Guard is charging you for the gap between where you stand and where the STCW 2EO stands, and the price is exactly what the distance is worth. That internal logic is the tell. Where the price is zero, the ranks are equivalent.

CAUTION — An internal tension in the CFR — flagged, not resolved 46 CFR 11.301(d) lists only Chief Engineer and First Assistant Engineer as the national feeders for management-level STCW endorsements. But Table 1 to 11.327(d) admits the Second Assistant Engineer and the Third Assistant Engineer — the Second with no additional service at all.

The two provisions do not agree. Our position, and the one to work from: the tables are the operative entry paths. They are specific, they are current, and they are what the NMC evaluators apply. But do not assert that 11.301(d) is exclusive, and do not build a career plan on the Second Assistant route without confirming it with the NMC in writing first.

Ratings do not climb this ladder

11.301(b)(1), and it is short: "Service as a rating will not be accepted to raise of grade from the operational-level to management-level STCW endorsements." Your QMED time built the ladder underneath you. It does not carry you across this particular step. From OICEW upward, the Coast Guard wants officer time.

What you do not have to repeat

NVIC 15-14, Enclosure (1), 2.d: "Operational-level training and assessments are not required if the mariner holds or has previously held an STCW endorsement as OICEW for 750 kW / 1,000 HP or more for the sought after propulsion mode."

Note the tail: for the sought after propulsion mode. If you held OICEW on motor vessels and you are now chasing management level on steam, the exemption does not travel with you across the mode boundary. Propulsion mode is a live constraint on the STCW side as well as the national one — Lesson 4.2.

So: assistant grades enter here. Chief grades enter at 11.325. And both tables sit behind the same 4,000 HP wall, which is next.

Practice questions

5 questions
recallcore

recall · core

Under Table 1 to 11.327(d), a Third Assistant Engineer needs how much additional sea service for the STCW III/2 Second Engineer Officer endorsement? (a) None (b) 6 months (c) 12 months (d) 24 months

recallcore

recall · core

46 CFR 11.301(d) and Table 1 to 11.327(d) conflict because: (a) 11.301(d) lists only Chief Engineer and First Assistant as management-level feeders, while the table also admits Second and Third Assistant Engineers (b) 11.301(d) uses kW while the table uses HP (c) The table omits the Chief Engineer (d) They apply to different propulsion modes

recallcore

recall · core

46 CFR 11.301(b)(1) provides that service as a rating: (a) Counts on a two-for-one basis toward management level (b) Counts in full toward management level (c) Counts only if performed on vessels of 3,000 kW or more (d) Will not be accepted to raise of grade from the operational level to management-level STCW endorsements

recallcore

recall · core

Under NVIC 15-14 Enclosure (1) 2.d, operational-level training and assessments are not required if the mariner: (a) Has 36 months of any engine-department service (b) Holds or has previously held an OICEW endorsement for 750 kW / 1,000 HP or more for the sought after propulsion mode (c) Holds any national engineer endorsement (d) Has completed Advanced Firefighting

recallcore

recall · core

The clearest evidence in the CFR that the STCW 2EO equals the US First Assistant is: (a) 11.301(d), which lists the management-level feeders (b) 10.107, which defines propulsion power (c) Table 1 to 11.327(d), which admits the First Assistant Engineer with zero additional sea service (d) 11.323(c), which sets the 750 kW floor

AI-drafted catalogue content pending SME review. STCW sea service, approved training and assessment requirements change; verify with the National Maritime Center before relying on this for a career decision.

School